公研心理 · 心理学公共研习平台 定义 · 要点 · 来源
首页 / 研究速递 / 2026-11-03
Research digest · 研究速递

控制错觉、赌徒谬误,还是两者都不是?通过扩展Langer和Roth(1975)的研究测试关键的赌博心理学模型

Illusion of Control, Gambler’s Fallacy, or Neither? Testing Key Models of Gambling Psychology by Extending Langer and Roth (1975)
Charlotte Eben、Ty Hayes、Zhang Chen · Journal of Gambling Studies · 2026-11-03

研究信息

期刊 / 来源
Journal of Gambling Studies
发表日期
2026-11-03
文献库
OpenAlex
作者
Charlotte Eben, Ty Hayes, Zhang Chen
DOI
10.1007/s10899-026-10575-3
读原文 ↗
英文原文摘要全文

Abstract Cognitive biases about randomness, such as the illusion of control and the gambler’s fallacy, are central to the widely-used cognitive models of disordered gambling. In a highly-cited foundational paper, Langer and Roth (1975) found that participants thought they were better at predicting coin-flips when they were randomised to receive more wins at the start rather than the end of a 30-flip sequence. This replicable effect, which has been attributed to the illusion of control, could also be driven by biases that do not involve active involvement, such as the gambler’s fallacy. We ther

中文摘要由自动翻译整理,可能丢掉原文的限定条件;涉及具体数字与结论时以英文原文为准。

这条研究涉及的词条

同一天收录的其它研究

免责声明 公研心理仅为心理学学习、知识研习工具平台。平台内所有心理测评结果、心理学解读仅供学习与自我探索参考,不可作为精神疾病诊断依据,不能替代精神科医师、注册心理师的专业评估。若长期存在情绪困扰,请前往正规医疗机构或专业心理服务机构求助。

内容用于快速浏览;学术引用与结论判断请以英文原文为准。