公研心理 · 心理学公共研习平台 定义 · 要点 · 来源
首页 / 研究速递 / 2026-11-04
Research digest · 研究速递

答案是肯定的。但问题是什么?向着运动与锻炼心理学更有用的理论发展

The answer is yes. But what was the question? Towards more useful theories in sport and exercise psychology
PsyArXiv 预印本 · 2026-11-04

研究信息

期刊 / 来源
PsyArXiv 预印本
发表日期
2026-11-04
文献库
psyarxiv
读原文 ↗
英文原文摘要全文

Debates about reform in sport and exercise psychology research largely center on the shortcomings of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) and the binary conclusions it produces. We argue that significance testing is not the main culprit. NHST matches our theories, which typically use boxes and arrows to state that an effect exists and in which direction. So changing the statistical tool we use does not change much of what we learn, because it does not alter the questions we pursue or the specificity of the predictions we make: the answers we seek and settle for remain yes or no. The goo

中文摘要由自动翻译整理,可能丢掉原文的限定条件;涉及具体数字与结论时以英文原文为准。

同一天收录的其它研究

免责声明 公研心理仅为心理学学习、知识研习工具平台。平台内所有心理测评结果、心理学解读仅供学习与自我探索参考,不可作为精神疾病诊断依据,不能替代精神科医师、注册心理师的专业评估。若长期存在情绪困扰,请前往正规医疗机构或专业心理服务机构求助。

内容用于快速浏览;学术引用与结论判断请以英文原文为准。