公研心理 · 心理学公共研习平台 定义 · 要点 · 来源
首页 / 研究速递 / 2026-11-05
Research digest · 研究速递

比较人类创建与AI生成的教材教授科学词汇:随机对照试验

Comparing Use of Human-Created to AI-Generated Instructional Materials to Teach Science Vocabulary: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Danielle Amin Waterfield、Rachel L. Kunemund、Eric Xie · Journal of Special Education Technology · 2026-11-05

研究信息

期刊 / 来源
Journal of Special Education Technology
发表日期
2026-11-05
文献库
OpenAlex
作者
Danielle Amin Waterfield, Rachel L. Kunemund, Eric Xie
DOI
10.1177/01626434261506259
读原文 ↗
英文原文摘要全文

Evidence-based vocabulary instruction is essential for literacy and content learning, yet many educators face barriers, such as lack of training and time constraints, to implementing it. Content Acquisition Podcasts (CAPs) are multimedia instruction that incorporate evidence-based practice to teach vocabulary yet can be arduous to create. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) examined whether generative AI-created Content Acquisition Podcasts–Student (CAP-S) produced vocabulary outcomes comparable to researcher-created CAP-S and whether cognitive load predicted performance. Participants inclu

中文摘要由自动翻译整理,可能丢掉原文的限定条件;涉及具体数字与结论时以英文原文为准。

这条研究涉及的词条

同一天收录的其它研究

免责声明 公研心理仅为心理学学习、知识研习工具平台。平台内所有心理测评结果、心理学解读仅供学习与自我探索参考,不可作为精神疾病诊断依据,不能替代精神科医师、注册心理师的专业评估。若长期存在情绪困扰,请前往正规医疗机构或专业心理服务机构求助。

内容用于快速浏览;学术引用与结论判断请以英文原文为准。