Specifying Innateness in Infant Development: A Framework for Theory-Building Based on Co-Determination
PsyArXiv 预印本 · 2026-10-31
从遗传、表观遗传、文化与神经科学四个视角,评估婴儿早期能力可推断“先天性”的强度,并提出共定框架。
这篇论文暂时没有中文摘要,下面保留英文原题与摘要。
研究信息
- 期刊 / 来源
- PsyArXiv 预印本
- 发表日期
- 2026-10-31
- 文献库
- psyarxiv
英文原文摘要全文
Infant research has often treated early neural and behavioral expression as a privileged window into the initial state of the mind, with early-emerging capacities sometimes uncritically taken as evidence of innate knowledge. This paper evaluates the strength of such inferences through four intersecting lenses: genetics and epigenetics, cultural evolution, definitional precision, and standards of scientific explanation and falsifiability. It distinguishes among several non-equivalent forms of innateness, including claims about representational content, architectural or processing biases, develo
中文摘要由自动翻译整理,可能丢掉原文的限定条件;涉及具体数字与结论时以英文原文为准。
这条研究涉及的词条
同一天收录的其它研究
Strength-based organizational approaches facilitate workplace opportunities for people from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds.
How we see relations: The case of containment and support.
Task-evoked pupillary responses reveal a role for attentional intensity in auditory discrimination.
Beyond Consequences of Challenge: the Degree to which Spoken Word Recognition Changes in Response to Difficulty has Independent Relevance
Does Outcome Utility Bias the Mental Simulations of Risky Events?
免责声明
公研心理仅为心理学学习、知识研习工具平台。平台内所有心理测评结果、心理学解读仅供学习与自我探索参考,不可作为精神疾病诊断依据,不能替代精神科医师、注册心理师的专业评估。若长期存在情绪困扰,请前往正规医疗机构或专业心理服务机构求助。
内容用于快速浏览;学术引用与结论判断请以英文原文为准。