On the size of the model selection problem in a conjoint measurement experiment
PsyArXiv 预印本 · 2026-10-31
方法学讨论：联合测量实验里模型选择问题的规模究竟有多大。
这篇论文暂时没有中文摘要，下面保留英文原题与摘要。
研究信息
- 期刊 / 来源
- PsyArXiv 预印本
- 发表日期
- 2026-10-31
- 文献库
- psyarxiv
英文原文摘要全文
We examine how the number of models respecting marginality in model selection using Maximum Likelihood Conjoint Measurement (MLCM) varies with the number of dimensions tested and explain the logic for determining this number. The results are related to Dedekind numbers, which increase super-exponentially, and, thus, suggest a limit to the number of dimensions that can be practically tested using the MLCM paradigm.
中文摘要由自动翻译整理，可能丢掉原文的限定条件；涉及具体数字与结论时以英文原文为准。
同一天收录的其它研究
Strength-based organizational approaches facilitate workplace opportunities for people from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds.
How we see relations: The case of containment and support.
Task-evoked pupillary responses reveal a role for attentional intensity in auditory discrimination.
Beyond Consequences of Challenge: the Degree to which Spoken Word Recognition Changes in Response to Difficulty has Independent Relevance
Does Outcome Utility Bias the Mental Simulations of Risky Events?
免责声明
公研心理仅为心理学学习、知识研习工具平台。平台内所有心理测评结果、心理学解读仅供学习与自我探索参考，不可作为精神疾病诊断依据，不能替代精神科医师、注册心理师的专业评估。若长期存在情绪困扰，请前往正规医疗机构或专业心理服务机构求助。
内容用于快速浏览；学术引用与结论判断请以英文原文为准。