When Creativity Goes Rogue: Semantic Organization in Conspiracy Thinkers and Politically Extreme Individuals
PsyArXiv 预印本 · 2026-10-31
比较阴谋论思维者与政治极端立场者的语义组织方式，看创造性思维的「跑偏」形态。
这篇论文暂时没有中文摘要，下面保留英文原题与摘要。
研究信息
- 期刊 / 来源
- PsyArXiv 预印本
- 发表日期
- 2026-10-31
- 文献库
- psyarxiv
英文原文摘要全文
This study addresses a gap in previous research by examining how semantic memory organization relates to conspiracy endorsement and political extremism. A total of N = 98 participants completed the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs (GCB) scale and an animal verbal fluency task (M_age= 27.88, 〖SD〗_age = 11.45; 59.18% female; 69.39% European). Of these, n = 96 also completed a self-placement political extremism item. Participants were grouped according to their levels of conspiracy thinking (high or low) and political extremity (moderate or extreme). We hypothesized that 1) political extremism would
中文摘要由自动翻译整理，可能丢掉原文的限定条件；涉及具体数字与结论时以英文原文为准。
这条研究涉及的词条
同一天收录的其它研究
Strength-based organizational approaches facilitate workplace opportunities for people from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds.
How we see relations: The case of containment and support.
Task-evoked pupillary responses reveal a role for attentional intensity in auditory discrimination.
Beyond Consequences of Challenge: the Degree to which Spoken Word Recognition Changes in Response to Difficulty has Independent Relevance
Does Outcome Utility Bias the Mental Simulations of Risky Events?
免责声明
公研心理仅为心理学学习、知识研习工具平台。平台内所有心理测评结果、心理学解读仅供学习与自我探索参考，不可作为精神疾病诊断依据，不能替代精神科医师、注册心理师的专业评估。若长期存在情绪困扰，请前往正规医疗机构或专业心理服务机构求助。
内容用于快速浏览；学术引用与结论判断请以英文原文为准。