Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing Need a Better Definition of “Test”
PsyArXiv 预印本 · 2026-11-03
这篇论文暂时没有中文摘要,下面保留英文原题与摘要。
研究信息
- 期刊 / 来源
- PsyArXiv 预印本
- 发表日期
- 2026-11-03
- 文献库
- psyarxiv
英文原文摘要全文
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing determine their scope by defining a “test”. This definition is of practical consequence due to the significance of Standards for test evaluation, individual-level and policy decisions, and legal proceedings. I argue the current version lacks sufficient clarity. In light of the ongoing revision of the Standards, I consider the language of the current codex and its purpose, along with its predecessors, and propose a new definition of “test” that addresses the issues of the current definition – big and small – while being rooted in the contempor
中文摘要由自动翻译整理,可能丢掉原文的限定条件;涉及具体数字与结论时以英文原文为准。
这条研究涉及的词条
同一天收录的其它研究
Malevolent Creativity and the Dark Tetrad – (Plenty of) Null Findings for Idea Generation Tasks
Simulation-based cutoffs for conditional item fit in Rasch models: iterations, multiplicity correction, and decision stability
GEST-A: A Hierarchical and Dynamic Framework of Conceptual Abstraction
Transitions in Teachers’ Technology Utilization: Evidence from a Large-Scale, Longitudinal, and International Panel Study
开发生物心理社会混合干预,以支持复杂下肢创伤后的患者
免责声明
公研心理仅为心理学学习、知识研习工具平台。平台内所有心理测评结果、心理学解读仅供学习与自我探索参考,不可作为精神疾病诊断依据,不能替代精神科医师、注册心理师的专业评估。若长期存在情绪困扰,请前往正规医疗机构或专业心理服务机构求助。
内容用于快速浏览;学术引用与结论判断请以英文原文为准。