在大鼠和人类视听时间秩序判断任务的背景下解决冲突
Conflict resolution in the context of an audiovisual temporal order judgment task in rat and human
Fatemeh Mafi、Sadegh Ghasemian、Mohammad Reza Afarinesh · Animal Cognition · 2026-10-31
摘要解决冲突是适应性决策的基础，但人们对物种在解决感官和反应冲突方面的差异仍知之甚少。
研究信息
- 期刊 / 来源
- Animal Cognition
- 发表日期
- 2026-10-31
- 文献库
- OpenAlex
- 作者
- Fatemeh Mafi, Sadegh Ghasemian, Mohammad Reza Afarinesh
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10071-026-02121-w
英文原文摘要全文
Abstract Conflict resolution is fundamental to adaptive decision-making, yet how species differ in resolving sensory and response conflicts remains poorly understood. Here, we compared conflict resolution in humans and rats using an analogous audiovisual temporal order judgment task, where the location of the first stimulus was either congruent or incongruent with the instructed response. Hierarchical Bayesian modeling was applied across three complementary analysis streams: distributional analyses of conditional accuracy and delta plots, psychometric functions, and drift–diffusion models. Dis
中文摘要由自动翻译整理，可能丢掉原文的限定条件；涉及具体数字与结论时以英文原文为准。
同一天收录的其它研究
Strength-based organizational approaches facilitate workplace opportunities for people from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds.
How we see relations: The case of containment and support.
Task-evoked pupillary responses reveal a role for attentional intensity in auditory discrimination.
Beyond Consequences of Challenge: the Degree to which Spoken Word Recognition Changes in Response to Difficulty has Independent Relevance
Does Outcome Utility Bias the Mental Simulations of Risky Events?
免责声明
公研心理仅为心理学学习、知识研习工具平台。平台内所有心理测评结果、心理学解读仅供学习与自我探索参考，不可作为精神疾病诊断依据，不能替代精神科医师、注册心理师的专业评估。若长期存在情绪困扰，请前往正规医疗机构或专业心理服务机构求助。
内容用于快速浏览；学术引用与结论判断请以英文原文为准。