Temporal Membranes: Non-Markovian Dependence and Selective Temporal Inheritance
Ken Howarth · Philosophies · 2026-10-30
讨论法律层面的马尔可夫性与非马尔可夫性推论能否支持现在主义或永恒主义。
这篇论文暂时没有中文摘要,下面保留英文原题与摘要。
研究信息
- 期刊 / 来源
- Philosophies
- 发表日期
- 2026-10-30
- 文献库
- OpenAlex
- 作者
- Ken Howarth
- DOI
- 10.3390/philosophies11060201
英文原文摘要全文
Recent arguments treat the Markovian character of fundamental laws as evidence for presentism and foundational non-Markovianity as pressure toward eternalism. This article argues that both inferences outrun the evidence. Law-level Markovianity, reduced-state non-Markovianity, Markovian embedding, and metaphysical screening-off are distinct. Even a complete state that screens off earlier conditions specifies dependence without settling which times exist; non-Markovian dynamics likewise calls for explanation without requiring past events to coexist with present ones. The neglected issue is selec
中文摘要由自动翻译整理,可能丢掉原文的限定条件;涉及具体数字与结论时以英文原文为准。
同一天收录的其它研究
A Dimensional Approach to PTSD After Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault: Impact on Sexual Functioning.
Women Empowerment and Its Relationship With Anxiety and Depression Symptoms Among Currently Married Women in Bangladesh: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Study.
Internalized HIV Stigma, Depressive Symptoms, and Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women With HIV in Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study.
First-year changes in mental health, lifestyle behaviors, and social support among international students at a Japanese university.
Norms for a German version of the Phenomenological Control Scale: measuring the capacity for creating and controlling experience.
免责声明
公研心理仅为心理学学习、知识研习工具平台。平台内所有心理测评结果、心理学解读仅供学习与自我探索参考,不可作为精神疾病诊断依据,不能替代精神科医师、注册心理师的专业评估。若长期存在情绪困扰,请前往正规医疗机构或专业心理服务机构求助。
内容用于快速浏览;学术引用与结论判断请以英文原文为准。