公研心理 · 心理学公共研习平台 定义 · 要点 · 来源
首页 / 研究速递 / 2026-10-30
Research digest · 研究速递

Post‐Sentence Responses to Syntax–Plausibility Conflict in Dative Sentences Produced With versus Without Stuttering

Nathan D. Maxfield、Gabriella L. Burgess Hayes、Supraja Anand · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · 2026-10-30

比较口吃与非口吃者产出的与格句中,句法—合理性冲突后加工(如P600)的差异。

这篇论文暂时没有中文摘要,下面保留英文原题与摘要。

研究信息

期刊 / 来源
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
发表日期
2026-10-30
文献库
OpenAlex
作者
Nathan D. Maxfield, Gabriella L. Burgess Hayes, Supraja Anand
DOI
10.1111/1460-6984.70364
读原文 ↗
英文原文摘要全文

BACKGROUND: During sentence comprehension, listeners may base an eventual interpretation on syntactic structure, event plausibility, or both. Whether the relationship between these information sources differs for sentences produced with versus without stuttering has not been established. AIMS: To test whether sentence plausibility and dative structure were related to the probability of a post-sentence response consistent with literal syntax differently for listeners who heard sentences produced with versus without stuttering. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Two hundred twenty-four adults each heard on

中文摘要由自动翻译整理,可能丢掉原文的限定条件;涉及具体数字与结论时以英文原文为准。

这条研究涉及的词条

同一天收录的其它研究

免责声明 公研心理仅为心理学学习、知识研习工具平台。平台内所有心理测评结果、心理学解读仅供学习与自我探索参考,不可作为精神疾病诊断依据,不能替代精神科医师、注册心理师的专业评估。若长期存在情绪困扰,请前往正规医疗机构或专业心理服务机构求助。

内容用于快速浏览;学术引用与结论判断请以英文原文为准。